Edelman, N. B. et al. Genomic architecture and introgression shape a butterfly radiation. Science 366, 594–599 (2019).
Arnold, B. J. et al. Borrowed alleles and convergence in serpentine adaptation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 8320–8325 (2016).
Sun, Y. et al. Large-scale introgression shapes the evolution of the mating-type chromosomes of the filamentous ascomycete Neurospora tetrasperma. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002820 (2012).
Greig, D. Reproductive isolation in Saccharomyces. Heredity 102, 39–44 (2009).
Peter, J. et al. Genome evolution across 1,011 Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolates. Nature 556, 339–344 (2018).
Wolf, A. B. & Akey, J. M. Outstanding questions in the study of archaic hominin admixture. PLoS Genet. 14, e1007349–e14 (2018).
Harrison, R. G. & Larson, E. L. Hybridization, introgression, and the nature of species boundaries. J. Hered. 105 (Suppl. 1), 795–809 (2014).
Mallet, J. Hybridization as an invasion of the genome. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 229–237 (2005).
Martin, S. H. & Jiggins, C. D. Interpreting the genomic landscape of introgression. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 47, 69–74 (2017).
Morales, L. & Dujon, B. Evolutionary role of interspecies hybridization and genetic exchanges in yeasts. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 76, 721–739 (2012).
Marsit, S. et al. Evolutionary biology through the lens of budding yeast comparative genomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 18, 581–598 (2017).
Hunter, N., Chambers, S. R., Louis, E. J. & Borts, R. H. The mismatch repair system contributes to meiotic sterility in an interspecific yeast hybrid. EMBO J. 15, 1726–1733 (1996).
Kao, K. C., Schwartz, K. & Sherlock, G. A genome-wide analysis reveals no nuclear dobzhansky-muller pairs of determinants of speciation between S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus, but suggests more complex incompatibilities. PLoS Genet. 6, e1001038 (2010).
Greig, D., Louis, E. J., Borts, R. H. & Travisano, M. Hybrid speciation in experimental populations of yeast. Science 298, 1773–1775 (2002).
Liti, G., Barton, D. B. H. & Louis, E. J. Sequence diversity, reproductive isolation and species concepts in Saccharomyces. Genetics 174, 839–850 (2006).
Liti, G. et al. Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts. Nature 458, 337–341 (2009).
Almeida, P. et al. A Gondwanan imprint on global diversity and domestication of wine and cider yeast Saccharomyces uvarum. Nat. Commun. 5, 4044 (2014).
Barbosa, R. et al. Evidence of natural hybridization in Brazilian wild lineages of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome Biol. Evol. 8, 317–329 (2016).
Gallone, B. et al. Interspecific hybridization facilitates niche adaptation in beer yeast. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1562–1575 (2019).
Langdon, Q. K. et al. Fermentation innovation through complex hybridization of wild and domesticated yeasts. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1576–1586 (2019).
Lee, H.-Y. et al. Incompatibility of nuclear and mitochondrial genomes causes hybrid sterility between two yeast species. Cell 135, 1065–1073 (2008).
Pontes, A., Čadež, N., Gonçalves, P. & Sampaio, J. P. A quasi-domesticate relic hybrid population of Saccharomyces cerevisiae × S. paradoxus adapted to olive brine. Front. Genet. 10, 449 (2019).
Bergström, A. et al. A high-definition view of functional genetic variation from natural yeast genomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 31, 872–888 (2014).
Yue, J.-X. et al. Contrasting evolutionary genome dynamics between domesticated and wild yeasts. Nat. Genet. 49, 913–924 (2017).
Symington, L. S., Rothstein, R. & Lisby, M. Mechanisms and regulation of mitotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 198, 795–835 (2014).
Dutta, A. et al. Genome dynamics of hybrid Saccharomyces cerevisiae during vegetative and meiotic divisions. G3 (Bethesda) 7, 3669–3679 (2017).
Tattini, L. et al. Accurate tracking of the mutational landscape of diploid hybrid genomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 36, 2861–2877 (2019).
Dunn, B. et al. Recurrent rearrangement during adaptive evolution in an interspecific yeast hybrid suggests a model for rapid introgression. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003366 (2013).
Smukowski Heil, C. S. et al. Loss of heterozygosity drives adaptation in hybrid yeast. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34, 1596–1612 (2017).
Bozdag, G. O. et al. Engineering recombination between diverged yeast species reveals genetic incompatibilities. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1101/755165 (2019).
Hou, J., Friedrich, A., de Montigny, J. & Schacherer, J. Chromosomal rearrangements as a major mechanism in the onset of reproductive isolation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr. Biol. 24, 1153–1159 (2014).
Rogers, D. W., McConnell, E., Ono, J. & Greig, D. Spore-autonomous fluorescent protein expression identifies meiotic chromosome mis-segregation as the principal cause of hybrid sterility in yeast. PLoS Biol. 16, e2005066 (2018).
Laureau, R. et al. Extensive recombination of a yeast diploid hybrid through meiotic reversion. PLoS Genet. 12, e1005781 (2016).
McClure, A. W., Jacobs, K. C., Zyla, T. R. & Lew, D. J. Mating in wild yeast: delayed interest in sex after spore germination. Mol. Biol. Cell 29, 3119–3127 (2018).
Kaniewski, D. et al. Primary domestication and early uses of the emblematic olive tree: palaeobotanical, historical and molecular evidence from the Middle East. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 87, 885–899 (2012).
Greig, D., Borts, R. H., Louis, E. J. & Travisano, M. Epistasis and hybrid sterility in Saccharomyces. Proc. Biol. Sci. 269, 1167–1171 (2002).
Charron, G., Marsit, S., Hénault, M., Martin, H. & Landry, C. R. Spontaneous whole-genome duplication restores fertility in interspecific hybrids. Nat. Commun. 10, 4126–10 (2019).
Tsai, I. J., Bensasson, D., Burt, A. & Koufopanou, V. Population genomics of the wild yeast Saccharomyces paradoxus: quantifying the life cycle. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 4957–4962 (2008).
Magwene, P. M. et al. Outcrossing, mitotic recombination, and life-history trade-offs shape genome evolution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 1987–1992 (2011).
Huerta-Sánchez, E. et al. Altitude adaptation in Tibetans caused by introgression of Denisovan-like DNA. Nature 512, 194–197 (2014).
Enard, D. & Petrov, D. A. Evidence that RNA viruses drove adaptive introgression between Neanderthals and modern humans. Cell 175, 360–371.e13 (2018).
Prüfer, K. et al. The complete genome sequence of a Neanderthal from the Altai Mountains. Nature 505, 43–49 (2014).
Slon, V. et al. The genome of the offspring of a Neanderthal mother and a Denisovan father. Nature 561, 113–116 (2018).
Liti, G., Warringer, J. & Blomberg, A. Isolation and laboratory domestication of natural yeast strains. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2017, pdb.prot089052–6 (2017).
Haber, J. E. Mating-type genes and MAT switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 191, 33–64 (2012).
Vázquez-García, I. et al. Clonal heterogeneity influences the fate of new adaptive mutations. Cell Rep. 21, 732–744 (2017).
De Chiara, M. et al. Domestication reprogrammed the budding yeast life cycle. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.08.939314 (2020).
Beltran, G., Novo, M., Rozès, N., Mas, A. & Guillamón, J. M. Nitrogen catabolite repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae during wine fermentations. FEMS Yeast Res. 4, 625–632 (2004).
Zackrisson, M. et al. Scan-o-matic: high-resolution microbial phenomics at a massive scale. G3 (Bethesda) 6, 3003–3014 (2016).
Barré, B. et al. Intragenic repeat expansion in the cell wall protein gene HPF1 controls yeast chronological aging. Genome Res. 30, 697–710 (2020).
Simpson, J. T. et al. ABySS: a parallel assembler for short read sequence data. Genome Res. 19, 1117–1123 (2009).
Yue, J.-X. & Liti, G. Long-read sequencing data analysis for yeasts. Nat. Protocols 13, 1213–1231 (2018).
Koren, S. et al. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res. 27, 722–736 (2017).
Chin, C.-S. et al. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat. Methods 10, 563–569 (2013).
Walker, B. J. et al. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS ONE 9, e112963 (2014).
Kurtz, S. et al. Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biol. 5, R12 (2004).
Lechner, M. et al. Proteinortho: detection of (co-)orthologs in large-scale analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 124 (2011).
McLaren, W. et al. The Ensembl variant effect predictor. Genome Biol. 17, 122 (2016).
Fay, J. C. & Benavides, J. A. Evidence for domesticated and wild populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet. 1, 66–71 (2005).
Rolland, T. & Dujon, B. Yeasty clocks: dating genomic changes in yeasts. C. R. Biol. 334, 620–628 (2011).
Bradley, R. K. et al. Fast statistical alignment. PLOS Comput. Biol. 5, e1000392 (2009).
Slater, G. S. C. & Birney, E. Automated generation of heuristics for biological sequence comparison. BMC Bioinformatics 6, 31 (2005).
Capella-Gutiérrez, S., Silla-Martínez, J. M. & Gabaldón, T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25, 1972–1973 (2009).
Bouckaert, R. et al. BEAST 2.5: An advanced software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLOS Comput. Biol. 15, e1006650 (2019).
Hasegawa, M., Kishino, H. & Yano, T. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 22, 160–174 (1985).
Drummond, A. J. & Suchard, M. A. Bayesian random local clocks, or one rate to rule them all. BMC Biol. 8, 114 (2010).
Heled, J. & Drummond, A. J. Bayesian inference of species trees from multilocus data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27, 570–580 (2010).
Shen, X.-X. et al. Tempo and mode of genome evolution in the budding yeast subphylum. Cell 175, 1533–1545.e20 (2018).
Pan, J. et al. A hierarchical combination of factors shapes the genome-wide topography of yeast meiotic recombination initiation. Cell 144, 719–731 (2011).
Ruderfer, D. M., Pratt, S. C., Seidel, H. S. & Kruglyak, L. Population genomic analysis of outcrossing and recombination in yeast. Nat. Genet. 38, 1077–1081 (2006).
Gerke, J., Lorenz, K. & Cohen, B. Genetic interactions between transcription factors cause natural variation in yeast. Science 323, 498–501 (2009).
Roncoroni, M. et al. The yeast IRC7 gene encodes a β-lyase responsible for production of the varietal thiol 4-mercapto-4-methylpentan-2-one in wine. Food Microbiol. 28, 926–935 (2011).